Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Mon, 21 Mar 2022 17:44:44 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
        "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
        linux-toolchains <linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the tip tree
Message-ID: <YjirfOJ2HQAnTrU4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20220321140327.777f9554@canb.auug.org.au>
 <Yjh11UjDZogc3foM@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <Yjh3xZuuY3QcZ1Bn@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <Yjh4xzSWtvR+vqst@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <YjiBbF+K4FKZyn6T@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <YjiZhRelDJeX4dfR@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <YjidpOZZJkF6aBTG@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAHk-=wigO=68WA8aMZnH9o8qRUJQbNJPERosvW82YuScrUTo7Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wigO=68WA8aMZnH9o8qRUJQbNJPERosvW82YuScrUTo7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 09:37:35AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:46 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > This landing in -next only today (after having been committed last
> > friday night) is another clue it should probably go next round.
> 
> I went and looked at lore to get the context that I didn't get in this
> email that I was added to the participants for.
> 
> I didn't find the context there either.
> 
> Sure, I found the thread, but the whole "that x86 patch" that you
> refer to was never actually specified even in the full thread as far
> as I can tell. I see that there is an arm64 equivalent too of what you
> are complaining about, and I have no idea about that one either..
> 
> Mind actually giving the full details so that we don't have to go
> re-do the work you already did?
> 
> Because right now I know something is wrong, I know the warnings, but
> I don't actually have any handle on the actual patches to look out
> for.
> 
> It's presumably not in any of the pull requests I already have
> pending, but it would be nice if I saw some details of _what_ you are
> complaining about, and not just the complaint itself ;)

Duh, right. It's this series:

  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/164757541675.26179.17727138330733641017.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/

That went into bpf-next last Friday. I just checked but haven't found a
pull for it yet.