Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To:     Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler updates for v5.18
References: <YjhZUezhnamHAl0H@gmail.com> <Yjh58h8cpcPERVZA@qian>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:59:01 +0800
In-Reply-To: <Yjh58h8cpcPERVZA@qian> (Qian Cai's message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2022
        09:13:22 -0400")
Message-ID: <8735jac0xm.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii
Precedence: bulk

Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:54:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Huang Ying (3):
>>       sched/numa-balancing: Move some document to make it consistent with the code
>>       sched/numa: Fix NUMA topology for systems with CPU-less nodes

These 2 patches are good.

>>       sched/numa: Avoid migrating task to CPU-less node

As Qian pointed out, this needs to be updated.

> Linus, I don't think you want to merge this as-is. This will introduce a
> kernel crash on arm64 NUMA as mentioned in this thread,
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yh6H8SPSqpjv1dl7@qian
>
> Ying sent an updated patch to fix the crash but is missing from this pull
> request for some reasons.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87y21lkxlv.fsf_-_@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com/

This is sent as an UPDATE patch.  Hi, Peter, do you need a new version
of patchset when some patches needs to be updated in general?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying