Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Ingo Molnar <mingo.kernel.org@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:07:13 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To:     "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler updates for v5.18
Message-ID: <Yjmt4SYBRh8bMVas@gmail.com>
References: <YjhZUezhnamHAl0H@gmail.com>
 <Yjh58h8cpcPERVZA@qian>
 <CAHk-=whrqeX-8yHEdSCGFUyyC2sj=OLyeFR9civUiswR=A+PwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <Yjl8Lk2uPiZkXoM9@gmail.com>
 <Yjl/T0SBCo1zfkkS@gmail.com>
 <871qyu5rim.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <871qyu5rim.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk


* Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi, Ingo,
> 
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> writes:
> 
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> >> 
> >> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 6:13 AM Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:54:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> > > > Huang Ying (3):
> >> > > >       sched/numa-balancing: Move some document to make it consistent with the code
> >> > > >       sched/numa: Fix NUMA topology for systems with CPU-less nodes
> >> > > >       sched/numa: Avoid migrating task to CPU-less node
> >> > >
> >> > > Linus, I don't think you want to merge this as-is. This will introduce a
> >> > > kernel crash on arm64 NUMA as mentioned in this thread,
> >> > 
> >> > Ok, dropped from my queue. Thanks,
> >> 
> >> I've reverted the broken commit & will send another pull request after 
> >> some testing. Sorry about that!
> >
> > Ended up using the fix below instead - it's tested already on the affected 
> > system.
> >
> 
> Thanks a lot for your help!
> 
> Is it a general rule to send a fixing patch for the bug of a patch
> merged by tip tree?  Or a new version of the patch is acceptable too?

Depends on how recently it got merged. This one was merged a few weeks ago, 
and the fix patch is simple enough, so I went for that approach.

Thanks,

	Ingo