Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 02:02:35 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@google.com>,
        Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@google.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
        Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: Rename "pci_dev->untrusted" to
 "pci_dev->poses_dma_risk"
Message-ID: <YjmQq1DvWnJwUh6R@infradead.org>
References: <20220320062907.3272903-1-rajatja@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220320062907.3272903-1-rajatja@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:29:05PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Rename the field to make it more clear, that the device can execute DMA
> attacks on the system, and thus the system may need protection from
> such attacks from this device.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
> ---
> v4: Initial version, created based on comments on other patch

What a horrible name.  Why not untrusted_dma which captures the
intent much better?