Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220310150905.1.Ie0a005d7a763d501e03b7abe8ee968ca99d23282@changeid>
 <CAMRc=McbY6vK_M9fP7Hzg8LE9ANOZKN49hmBFn92YFH+2ToM8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=McbY6vK_M9fP7Hzg8LE9ANOZKN49hmBFn92YFH+2ToM8w@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:39:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf8ktdCYTAULz2j-3CPON75707TpwV0FDL36V_GQ4Ttgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Drop CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc:     Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 6:35 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:09 AM Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:

> I like it. It's true we don't see many of those DEBUG constructs
> anymore nowadays and overhead for might_sleep() and WARN_ON() is
> negligible.

I don't like the part about removing -DDEBUG at all.

> Applied, thanks!

Shall I send a partial revert?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko