Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CGME20220321090202epcas2p1bfa78db059c1f6f6acbbb015e4bf991c@epcas2p1.samsung.com>
 <1647853194-62147-1-git-send-email-dh10.jung@samsung.com> <YjhB7+AaEXvuUmdi@kroah.com>
 <20220321092409.GA62265@ubuntu> <YjhGKVKuPsKG80wZ@kroah.com>
 <20220321100631.GB62265@ubuntu> <YjhQg4I7eYWXIfgr@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <YjhQg4I7eYWXIfgr@kroah.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 18:05:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPdmSUqs+d3CuJ9px=vWPPdgP0scAZvKJkKDrs5O+sw6yA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] support USB offload feature
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Jung Daehwan <dh10.jung@samsung.com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
        "open list:USB XHCI DRIVER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Howard Yen <howardyen@google.com>,
        Jack Pham <jackp@codeaurora.org>,
        Puma Hsu <pumahsu@google.com>,
        "J . Avila" <elavila@google.com>, sc.suh@samsung.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 11:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > [v3, 0/4] add xhci-exynos driver
> >
> > This patchset is for support xhci-exynos driver....
> > ....
> >
> >   usb: host: export symbols for xhci-exynos to use xhci hooks
> >   usb: host: add xhci hooks for xhci-exynos
> >   usb: host: add some to xhci overrides for xhci-exynos
> >   usb: host: add xhci-exynos driver
>
> Yes, that makes much more sense.  What would you want to see if you had
> to review such a series?

Unfortunately it might not make more sense, because last time
xhci-exynos driver was a fake driver, not for submission. It did not
compile, it did not work in mainline.

That driver was not even sent to proper mailing lists, as pointed out
by get_maintainers.pl, maybe because it was not developed on the
mainline kernel, so there is no MAINTAINERS file?


Best regards,
Krzysztof