Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <41973e94-c825-fa04-0dc8-cc1fe6b86d5c@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:01:13 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.4.0
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>,
        "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
References: <20220301201659.45ac94cd@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20220324183329.22c97ea1@canb.auug.org.au>
 <2f33bdce-a002-708a-dd65-7bfb6ebc4cd9@redhat.com>
 <20220324222241.42896e9e@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220324222241.42896e9e@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Stephen,

On 3/24/22 12:22, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 08:39:19 +0100 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> I replied to your original report on March 1st, but I never got a reply
>> to my reply:
>>
>> """
>> Thank you for the report.
>>
>> So I just did:
>>
>> touch Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel_sdsi
>> make htmldocs &> log
>>
>> In a repo with drivers-x86/for-next checked out and checked the generated log files.
>> But I'm not seeing these WARNINGs.
>>
>> Also 'find Documentation/output/ -name "*sdsi*"' does not output anything,
>> is there anything special (maybe some extra utilities?) which I need to also enable
>> building of htmldocs for the files in Documentation/ABI ?
>> """
>>
>> If someone can let me know how to reproduce these warnings I would be happy
>> to fix them.
> 
> Sorry about that.  I am just doing what you are doing but with the
> whole of linux-next (which I don't think would make a difference).  One
> possibility is that we are using different versions of the doco
> software.
> 
> I am using Sphinx version 4.3.2 (using Python 3).

[hans@shalem ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/sphinx-apidoc
python3-sphinx-4.4.0-1.fc36.noarch

So I did some digging and the trick for reproducing any ABI
related warnings is to touch the .rst file which has the
"kernel-abi" reST directive (1) for the ABI subdir you want
to regenerate the ABI docs for


 this is
t
I doubt this makes a difference though. AFAIK the build process
for the files under Documentation/ABI is a bit different,
I think there is an extra pre-process step involved and maybe
I'm missing something needed for that step ?

Looking at Documentation/Makefile I did 

Regards,

Hans