Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030292AbXBZPO6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:14:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751259AbXBZPO6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:14:58 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:43985 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751245AbXBZPO5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:14:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:44:42 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Andrew Morton , Pavel Machek , Aneesh Kumar , "Paul E. McKenney" , Gautham R Shenoy Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] Freezer: Fix vfork problem Message-ID: <20070226151442.GA29869@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com References: <200702261139.59130.rjw@sisk.pl> <200702261147.12274.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070226120043.GB234@tv-sign.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070226120043.GB234@tv-sign.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 17 On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 03:00:43PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > In that case we should also modify ____call_usermodehelper(), otherwise we have > the same "deadlock" if it is frozen. But this is not so easy to do as I thought > before. Before ____call_usermodehelper can freeze, it should have entered userspace right? By that time, its vfork parent should have definitely woken up, which should avoid the deadlock you point out? -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/