Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2726:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ib38csp2127871pxb; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8KHcs1j0vxHJ2bC4T+uoqOy16f2gfQpmMoQ2Ujd64e/ACBnpWInzrMyQPaOVq8IDliGTe X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e74a:b0:153:f956:1cf5 with SMTP id p10-20020a170902e74a00b00153f9561cf5mr12659917plf.138.1648233257343; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1648233257; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rcFuhebyEblRTHElWz5wwY5SZYrxQAXwvzelQ967SllmYntVQVudYWKkG07LYz/oJP 9KFNLj+uEc9HMZC856cLImhYGJ4P7tZ435RLWWDBlR9WcH9kleM1mwmu4Uc/UYZ4FDoh HuPvgVTicUsskPfn88Fh2CZWQ5V9Hrsmbp9wfo6a8DC52lMcPG4XAr5EO0RNxYiZ/NAu +lQTzsRd7+EdHZmk7pQB326Ovck0iuG919QCu/BQFLfsdMtQS4fUBjCDgbVM0QZDv885 Ivs9UyCj0sxTvsgqdBrgHOQ7X0LsYQa4G5zhKXWUilvRsFK/UULeR5BJ5Jirz7NK5VJH 3nDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Rs+hkLtuejz0jp8IG6j+lCynmaYU2c6Un9EnKH5Ij0I=; b=yn9ja9suXIQ/RS/wquOJMSw1DLVdiLDvYe4TgVZVaI7T8/krKvknp16NPFYCBlUPhU OEkuKgK/7uEdMU3NyQKoLDxZ/WwnO0A2XbDgewKkKTDG2IE4aiY8NYjONsvKqm6VXKLg cdFaLD5aVaCN4+PoT+zrYqk5kf+wTwC9HJ1JyHS7e60as+f7DIF6HTHFJXGbs+WcNoK2 +wm+YG8ecME3y9HgDlDodHGqkJKxrSSYkKhCKQZ++vMFCunEMm7nX9l7kkfJHmJoG/4r 4CZVdGOFvVKjaeJs4KKGNyyErIiMTOPgQ9p0ua/uKhYaxhlnvFDffSN2/Y6zUU5teQuX ircg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=Oqpul6J7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [2620:137:e000::1:18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ng6-20020a17090b1a8600b001bed521b961si3298095pjb.10.2022.03.25.11.34.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=Oqpul6J7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D640188A36; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:54:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243946AbiCXTtX (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:49:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40468 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241865AbiCXTtU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:49:20 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73DFD4EF6C for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id k21so9882595lfe.4 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:47:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Rs+hkLtuejz0jp8IG6j+lCynmaYU2c6Un9EnKH5Ij0I=; b=Oqpul6J72/k8EqWztUoLjeFDKjEMWUCgohu5BJCmPHoWIbKngOJcLXigRdM/5+xArg zIq0bJSPGyga61BwSQKKQVkhg9ofNwzZUW2YeeAkjqko1ah20e/Twqu+KJxa0QEEhzTm Ce1gXWGp3lk8SHnpjJzozBrXo8rgpOecx7moI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Rs+hkLtuejz0jp8IG6j+lCynmaYU2c6Un9EnKH5Ij0I=; b=N+x14ndRNiurrXuHNEyZM85st8/btYiDKNhSivGqOLNUPbzogG1oRLACCd5i9yTZ9d ivUc7Hro4QhMS3YCQrGVRuqtzAJH1A5O3sav8p8WA6xsSkvss7O6c7P0vAWPwrRGiz1T 7jcv6KABXEjb59crU4YurPRlF1Uz1SvdhjiFzFXi2095UB9IT2n1jVpaBM/ZfbsuI9E1 nDd1JERBOqOlb1hRmYQt/j7lA29Y6o18tiVOYMFoY5ljT7hDuHy09oaJHqjf+X1hFoT7 OL3rK1mJOYU31rJsCoqDnNDF0tsUVYiWnDbncdr243ekEsCWxSZQDqBMW8EUZcnWUNug zNxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wmKCdu7ELPJbdeQj9etqDFfsjhdD+D2toMFNK8HBZa/6G26yO Gys6/HP5Yh9nEufQMaoQFREi0yDxF9cQtDqSDcI= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4c51:0:b0:44a:34b8:fd72 with SMTP id o17-20020ac24c51000000b0044a34b8fd72mr4871282lfk.360.1648151265539; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:47:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f181.google.com (mail-lj1-f181.google.com. [209.85.208.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i3-20020a198c43000000b00448a1566977sm441792lfj.275.2022.03.24.12.47.44 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:47:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f181.google.com with SMTP id o6so7601806ljp.3 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:47:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1213:b0:247:e2d9:cdda with SMTP id i19-20020a05651c121300b00247e2d9cddamr5411119lja.443.1648151264448; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:47:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0000000000009901d505dafc07b3@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:47:28 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in list_lru_add To: syzbot Cc: Andrew Morton , Dmitry Vyukov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-MM , Muchun Song , syzkaller-bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:45 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:41 PM syzbot > wrote: > > > > syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger any issue: > > Heh, well that's unfortunate. > > I think the issue is that it triggered a new BUG() that didn't match > the previous NULL pointer dereference, so it thinks things are > "fixed". Oh, no, it's because it used the truncated patch that didn't do anything: > patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=1208043d700000 and maybe (due to the racy nature) nothing actually happened. Linus