Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:21:14 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        "Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 bpf-next 1/1] rethook: x86: Add rethook x86
 implementation
Message-Id: <20220325112114.4604291a58ee5b214ee334da@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLfu+uDUmovM8sOJSnH=HGxMEtmjk4+nWsAR+Mdj2TTYg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <164800288611.1716332.7053663723617614668.stgit@devnote2>
        <164800289923.1716332.9772144337267953560.stgit@devnote2>
        <YjrUxmABaohh1I8W@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
        <20220323204119.1feac1af0a1d58b8e63acd5d@kernel.org>
        <CAADnVQLfu+uDUmovM8sOJSnH=HGxMEtmjk4+nWsAR+Mdj2TTYg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:03:43 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 4:41 AM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 09:05:26 +0100
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:34:59AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > > Add rethook for x86 implementation. Most of the code has been copied from
> > > > kretprobes on x86.
> > >
> > > Right; as said, I'm really unhappy with growing a carbon copy of this
> > > stuff instead of sharing. Can we *please* keep it a single instance?
> >
> > OK, then let me update the kprobe side too.
> >
> > > Them being basically indentical, it should be trivial to have
> > > CONFIG_KPROBE_ON_RETHOOK (or somesuch) and just share this.
> >
> > Yes, ideally it should use CONFIG_HAVE_RETHOOK since the rethook arch port
> > must be a copy of the kretprobe implementation. But for safety, I think
> > having CONFIG_KPROBE_ON_RETHOOK is a good idea until replacing all kretprobe
> > implementations.
> 
> Masami,
> 
> you're respinning this patch to combine
> arch_rethook_trampoline and __kretprobe_trampoline
> right?

Yes, let me send the first patch set (for x86 at first).

BTW, can you review these 2 patches? These are only for the fprobes,
so it can be picked to bpf-next.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/164802091567.1732982.1242854551611267542.stgit@devnote2/T/#u

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>