Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:06:12 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] locking changes for v5.18
Message-ID: <Yj2+RDmBGHto4+e/@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <YjhdcJB4FaLfsoyO@gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wjS6ptr5=JqmmyEb_qTjDz_68+S=h1o1bL1fEyArVOymA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YjpLiKRUIB4TGJm0@zn.tnic>
 <CAHk-=wifoM9VOp-55OZCRcO9MnqQ109UTuCiXeZ-eyX_JcNVGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <Yj2qZT6gdRYpkSIR@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <20220325122336.GQ8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220325122336.GQ8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 01:23:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 01:41:25PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 03:58:47PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 3:20 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ah, you say build error because you have CONFIG_WERROR=y.
> > > 
> > > EVERYBODY should have CONFIG_WERROR=y on at least x86-64 and other
> > > serious architectures, unless you have some completely random
> > > experimental (and broken) compiler.
> > > 
> > > New compiler warnings are not acceptable.
> > 
> > What about old one? I have already complained in the early discussion that
> > `make W=1 ...` is broken by this change. Enabling it without fixing
> > _existing_ warnings on W=1 is not suitable for somebody. Now, I have to
> > modify my configs to disable WERROR because of inability to built at all.
> > 
> > (Yes, I understand that I may drop W=1, but that's not the point. since I
> >  want to have clean builds of a new code on level 1 of warnings)
> 
> It would be fairly easy to make scripts/Makefile.extrawarn strip out
> -Werror when W= is used.

Hmm... I can't achieve this, because it complains about recursive variable.
What helped me is to supply in such case -Wno-error which seems overrode
the previous setting.

I'll send a patch to discuss further if needed.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko