Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:52:17 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/config: Make the x86 defconfigs a bit more usable
Message-ID: <Yj2s8WZ4Pv1QuckE@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <YjhdcJB4FaLfsoyO@gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wjS6ptr5=JqmmyEb_qTjDz_68+S=h1o1bL1fEyArVOymA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YjpLiKRUIB4TGJm0@zn.tnic>
 <CAHk-=wifoM9VOp-55OZCRcO9MnqQ109UTuCiXeZ-eyX_JcNVGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YjsCpoRK7W4l6tSh@zn.tnic>
 <CAHk-=wi9pLxm+dXoCaiGO+f0EbhyfAR_L510vD0c2=hj6rbMXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YjwsUT/6PkRPjnHE@gmail.com>
 <YjySjys3QZAWFlfo@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YjySjys3QZAWFlfo@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 08:47:27AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:31:13AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > --- a/arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig

> > -# CONFIG_64BIT is not set
> 
> I don't think this is right, this is repeating the problem that was
> fixed by commit 76366050eb1b ("x86/defconfigs: Explicitly unset
> CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig").
> 
> $ make ARCH=i386 savedefconfig
> 
> ?

+1 here, there are still branches in use that have i386 defconfig as
as base and making this problem again is not okay.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko