Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
From:   Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>,
        Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Olha Cherevyk <olha.cherevyk@gmail.com>,
        iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Recent swiotlb DMA_FROM_DEVICE fixes break ath9k-based AP
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 20:35:37 +0100
Message-ID: <8043549.T7Z3S40VBb@natalenko.name>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wghZ3c4G2xjy3pR7txmdCnau21z_tidjfU2w0HO-90=sw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1812355.tdWV9SEqCh@natalenko.name> <12981608.uLZWGnKmhe@natalenko.name> <CAHk-=wghZ3c4G2xjy3pR7txmdCnau21z_tidjfU2w0HO-90=sw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On p=C3=A1tek 25. b=C5=99ezna 2022 20:27:43 CET Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:26 PM Oleksandr Natalenko
> <oleksandr@natalenko.name> wrote:
> >
> > On p=C3=A1tek 25. b=C5=99ezna 2022 19:30:21 CET Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > The reason the ath9k issue was found quickly
> > > is very likely *NOT* because ath9k is the only thing affected. No,
> > > it's because ath9k is relatively common.
> >
> > Indeed. But having a wife who complains about non-working Wi-Fi printer=
 definitely helps in finding the issue too.
>=20
> Well, maybe we should credit her in the eventual resolution (whatever
> it ends up being).
>=20
> Although probably not using that exact wording.

While Olha has already been Cc'ed here, I can definitely encourage her in p=
erson to provide Reported-by/Tested-by if needed :).

=2D-=20
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)