Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281468AbRKZDS7>; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 22:18:59 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281448AbRKZDSt>; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 22:18:49 -0500
Received: from host.nec.com.au ([147.76.180.129]:3344 "EHLO
	firewall.nec.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S281462AbRKZDSi>; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 22:18:38 -0500
Subject: Re: IDE is still crap.. or something
From: Daniel Stone <DanielS@esd.nec.com.au>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.2 (Preview Release)
Date: 27 Nov 2001 14:17:17 +1100
Message-Id: <1006831037.2070.0.camel@syslogd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

To quote you (I'm pulling this from the archives as I can't handle the
l-k mail load anymore):

>Also, I'm not meaning to sound important or anything with my sig. Maybe
>I 
> should change it? Hmm... 
>
>
> 
> > Regards, 
> > 
> > Andre Hedrick 
> > Linux ATA Development 
> > Linux Disk Certification Project 
> _____________________________________________________ 
> | Martin Eriksson <nitrax@giron.wox.org> 
> | Linux developer / Ignorant excuse for a human / 
> | Ranting bastard / Swede 

I suggest you remove "Linux developer" from your sig. I had "Linux
Kernel Developer" in there for a while, and it was somewhat of a
recurring topic on debian-devel, and made me look like a pretencious
prick. So, unless your name's in CREDITS, or MAINTAINERS, it's not a
terribly good thing to put in your sig. :)

--
Daniel Stone					<DanielS@esd.nec.com.au>
Linux/UNIX Developer, NEC Business Solutions
(not a Linux Kernel Developer)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/