Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
To:     lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz,
        tiwai@suse.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com
Cc:     trevor.wu@mediatek.com, tzungbi@google.com,
        dan.carpenter@oracle.com, jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com,
        rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com, yc.hung@mediatek.com,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mediatek: mt8195: fix a missing check on list iterator
Date:   Sun, 27 Mar 2022 16:17:12 +0800
Message-Id: <20220327081712.13341-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

The bug is here:
 mt8195_etdm_hw_params_fixup(runtime, params);

For the for_each_card_rtds(), just like list_for_each_entry(),
the list iterator 'runtime' will point to a bogus position
containing HEAD if the list is empty or no element is found.
This case must be checked before any use of the iterator,
otherwise it will lead to a invalid memory access.

To fix the bug, use a new variable 'iter' as the list iterator,
while use the original variable 'runtime' as a dedicated pointer
to point to the found element.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3d00d2c07f04f ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: add sof support on mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682")
Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
---
 .../mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682.c  | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682.c
index 29c2d3407cc7..dc91877e4c3c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682.c
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static int mt8195_dai_link_fixup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd,
 {
 	struct snd_soc_card *card = rtd->card;
 	struct snd_soc_dai_link *sof_dai_link = NULL;
-	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *runtime;
+	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *runtime = NULL, *iter;
 	struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai;
 	int i, j, ret = 0;
 
@@ -824,16 +824,17 @@ static int mt8195_dai_link_fixup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd,
 		if (strcmp(rtd->dai_link->name, conn->normal_link))
 			continue;
 
-		for_each_card_rtds(card, runtime) {
-			if (strcmp(runtime->dai_link->name, conn->sof_link))
+		for_each_card_rtds(card, iter) {
+			if (strcmp(iter->dai_link->name, conn->sof_link))
 				continue;
 
-			for_each_rtd_cpu_dais(runtime, j, cpu_dai) {
+			for_each_rtd_cpu_dais(iter, j, cpu_dai) {
 				if (cpu_dai->stream_active[conn->stream_dir] > 0) {
-					sof_dai_link = runtime->dai_link;
+					sof_dai_link = iter->dai_link;
 					break;
 				}
 			}
+			runtime = iter;
 			break;
 		}
 
@@ -845,7 +846,8 @@ static int mt8195_dai_link_fixup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd,
 
 	if (!strcmp(rtd->dai_link->name, "ETDM2_IN_BE") ||
 	    !strcmp(rtd->dai_link->name, "ETDM1_OUT_BE")) {
-		mt8195_etdm_hw_params_fixup(runtime, params);
+		if (runtime)
+			mt8195_etdm_hw_params_fixup(runtime, params);
 	}
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.17.1