Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Yj19RH3qpzQsIV/O@shikoro>
In-Reply-To: <Yj19RH3qpzQsIV/O@shikoro>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:45:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh0M10owjNcKvw3Vgdv7_SwJch4d0HEjBXYj3nPfrJ-UA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for v5.18
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 1:28 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/for-mergewindow

Oh, and another comment about this pull request: you are one of five
people whose pull requests remain unsigned.

So you're not exactly alone, but it's a (happily) shrinking group of
kernel maingainers that don't use signed tags for pulls.

Of course, I haven't checked the ones that are still pending in
linux-next, but I've done 127 merges so far this merge window, and 93%
of them have been using signed tags (and three of them have been the
Andrew Morton email patch-bomb merges).

Yes, that's a good percentage, but it could be even better. Hint hint.

               Linus