Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030586AbXB0Io7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 03:44:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932862AbXB0IoY (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 03:44:24 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:52006 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030583AbXB0IoT (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 03:44:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:33:49 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Michal Piotrowski Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "David P. Reed" , Ayaz Abdulla , jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Albert Hopkins , Bob Tracy , Mark Brown , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 2) Message-ID: <20070227083349.GB30376@elte.hu> References: <20070226220521.GB29575@stusta.de> <1172564491.3709.5.camel@chaos> <45E3ECF1.4040906@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <45E3ECF1.4040906@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1485 Lines: 39 * Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Thomas Gleixner napisaƂ(a): > > Adrian, > > > > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:05 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> Subject : kernel BUG at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:168 (CONFIG_NO_HZ) > >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/16/346 > >> Submitter : Michal Piotrowski > >> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner > >> Status : problem is being debugged > > > > The BUG_ON() was replaced by a warning printk(). The BUG_ON() exposed a > > problem with the SMT scheduler. See below. > > > >> Subject : BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0 > >> NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 20 (SMT scheduler) > >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/20/257 > >> Submitter : Michal Piotrowski > >> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner > >> Ingo Molnar > >> Status : problem is being debugged > > > > Patch available, not confirmed yet. > > > > I can confirm that the bug is fixed (over 20 hours of testing should > be enough). thanks alot! I think this thing was a long-term performance/latency regression in HT scheduling as well. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/