Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750888AbXB0ME6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:04:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750881AbXB0ME6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:04:58 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([217.147.92.249]:3381 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750830AbXB0ME5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:04:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:04:50 +0000 From: Russell King To: Linux Kernel List , Greg KH Subject: __must_check and driver model Message-ID: <20070227120450.GB2154@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel List , Greg KH Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 20 I'm still seeing lots of warnings about unchecked return codes from driver model functions. These must have been around for at least three months, if not longer, and there seems to be very little progress towards resolving them. Maybe if no one cares about fixing the warnings, we shouldn't have the warnings at all since they're just mere noise. Can we resolve to either fix the warnings, or remove the ineffective __must_check annotations? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/