Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2726:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ib38csp5649366pxb; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:29:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwP8goE15j99lOEg6pxS3c9+8iLKtL7rtE685Bd5L+uPjjuNkR0tc7DNdEfeeAezCRnQbSu X-Received: by 2002:a67:f7cf:0:b0:325:31f8:a556 with SMTP id a15-20020a67f7cf000000b0032531f8a556mr12347388vsp.77.1648506594063; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:29:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1648506594; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ydZxDF1+jaAdozwK8V7mp6VplIxa1ZhPf2Cy9yh2qFjxZ8p8mq3PQ6apeypSXBfoa/ xfrG4UUCVD+flWmS458jvMnpqIxbH2DoEtZpAOBKfNl8ta5y4YXj07MMLAoQNEhXh5Yn lrVcyGQMbS7AZrALUEA/9J76b43/Ojg5qZSk0c2e99BySLxJHNgtIFlA4BudUYJmTI78 XK+E6StPUlS9+jTOiZLOLPNgpuEN+vPqj7AV0QLVO2nCn8FY/HV5QV012jZWjM3zvZMq ZjLl1/OR/a7m20Q7ceI3CTLCpocl8K8EO9euLk3Jowcb2FXH1KYyfn0cXZhcWbJrIDB5 Vm6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=KElUiPZJmlu+bscSLCKI3jUJiul+biPhPcK8ScQBm7g=; b=MbQMDQjggpyXfwsGl2fAgmsroIAcFEx9tvcUy21rKcEDdZQ21l+GVwhkTVBdl4UM/Q J0ID0JkoJdjuT+XpyyArNe1Lt3luVlU1vxprgV9l4297xsepMaLFysOWBL5tEMqU64L/ ijbkSOM+Mw6QHOCsXLd/ShkQ0G+LEXIkwfgI8nUqRbyXh+Ra9NAnbCm3Yaq5yL7jj8P4 HW7qlHJX/HL8w0FfKUtP7f+3yrWAa8ETxIHEBAD2lk1pBCzJ+OFnjjFeAillBhFIp4YB Iln+vyLuc2lUxBvNyTuXmHR5FTLx6j0i/bREY2Tn3ZS1SCjx+leXgGrbaJGREp/E8Tvz eotQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=2UhoFhYL; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b="5omu/EAI"; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u142-20020a672e94000000b00325511f71e1si2978258vsu.628.2022.03.28.15.29.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=2UhoFhYL; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b="5omu/EAI"; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9491D1C7EBA; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239752AbiC1Qa3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:30:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55168 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237772AbiC1Qa2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:30:28 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DA2E27B1E for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:28:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1648484925; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KElUiPZJmlu+bscSLCKI3jUJiul+biPhPcK8ScQBm7g=; b=2UhoFhYL98/AhB/ZNcs2xDZ6kJliAONaMSCORQCj75F4WZ+IZjAWjMQzgbnK/QqYG1WwSG DpTlE+hl3LIGKqrjK8mPQuFhWV2qLw6tYhFJsyyq4ah2LGhpyqVad3uRVlhLkSfHH85jbY BOqeTuYlPIy9zxcpdlR7xxAcpqnGVj9WqZiIIKW1XTR/SuoYsdtONLTGUgF/PoTf7WRqDw rGKI3FPE6g4nl9F7+ONu+h1Gysq7czEHfc1L//5RvrYWYXBAdDMLuGxRUb1hTxt/nB9Bvv e4pTef6u88KquXmSd8jrHcQHgPzJaQKRVwTFImF6cLcf5MBEbol3G+Pq1a0eoA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1648484925; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KElUiPZJmlu+bscSLCKI3jUJiul+biPhPcK8ScQBm7g=; b=5omu/EAIJwCEMPl6keG5xaAyoGqmxWMlt7/4NWmCwm4H8G5uIhqAiV6PFeOco+scojvIF9 AS6kEE5VCQpaXXDw== To: "Eric W. Biederman" , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Ben Segall , Borislav Petkov , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Dave Hansen , Dietmar Eggemann , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Mel Gorman , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Vincent Guittot Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal/x86: Delay calling signals in atomic In-Reply-To: <8735j2xigt.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> References: <8735j2xigt.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 18:28:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87tubif3cz.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 28 2022 at 09:25, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes: > Further this code is buggy. TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is not the correct > flag to set to enter into exit_to_usermode_loop. TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is > about that happens after signal handling. This very much needs to be > TIF_SIGPENDING with recalc_sigpending and friends updated to know about > "task->force_info". > > Does someone own this problem? Can that person please fix this > properly? > > I really don't think it is going to be maintainable for PREEMPT_RT to > maintain a separate signal delivery path for faults from the rest of > linux. Fair enough. Let me queue a revert and go back to the drawing board. Thanks, tglx