Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:59:17 +0000
From:   Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC:     Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@live.ca>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: wm8994: Add an off-on delay for WM8994
 variant
Message-ID: <20220328145917.GJ38351@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>
References: <YkDpozx+ZmSWwwH0@sirena.org.uk>
 <CY4PR04MB056771CFB80DC447C30D5A31CB1D9@CY4PR04MB0567.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <20220328131132.GI38351@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>
 <YkHIBXixM1rERxqg@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YkHIBXixM1rERxqg@sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 03:36:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 01:11:32PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> 
> > Part of me wonders if we should just apply it to 1811 and 8958
> > anyway, I suspect they have the same IP for the LDO and its just
> > the datasheets never got updated. I had a go chasing the apps guys
> > here but we are a little short on people who remember details of
> > these parts. So I guess we trust the datasheets for now, unless
> > you have any strong feelings, Mark?
> 
> With something like this the on/off time may be a requirement of the
> thing being powered rather than the regulator, the device might see
> enough power loss to confuse state but not trip the power on reset.

Aye a good point. I am certainly happy to stick with trusting the
datasheets here.

Thanks,
Charles