Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACRpkdZ_Jr3OzfoOpSSsAJMy1Oe_=zD861jouDzCVD-BQ6yZMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=whzqAB6kfHUcX2uhfPnNiWJRq=UmeA1TbgGi3XA+57j3w@mail.gmail.com> <YkIqyb6lhn5uU2jb@latitude>
In-Reply-To: <YkIqyb6lhn5uU2jb@latitude>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:41:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjxvNGEUUN5fj203KJL8qXK3jv359Ketc-HJMJU9wN6KA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] pin control bulk changes for v5.18
To:     =?UTF-8?Q?Jonathan_Neusch=C3=A4fer?= <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 2:38 PM Jonathan Neusch=C3=A4fer
<j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> It was =E2=80=94 but when it was noticed, the fix went through the IRQ tr=
ee, on
> top of a refactoring that happened there (the switch to generic_handle_do=
main_irq):
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/164751044707.389.16417510835118111853.tip-bo=
t2@tip-bot2/

Ok, that ends up at least being identical to what I did, so thats' good.

> When I added the pinctrl-wpcm450 driver, I changed the pinctrl/nuvoton/
> directory to obj-y and exposed the pinctrl-npcm7xx to CI bot testing.
> The bug existed, untouched, since the driver was added a few years ago.

Ahh. Good. So not a heisenbug, just happened to be hidden before.

Thanks for clarifying,

                 Linus