Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 23:19:41 -0300
From:   Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@suse.de>
To:     CGEL <cgel.zte@gmail.com>
Cc:     rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@gmail.com,
        paul@paul-moore.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        eparis@redhat.com, Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>,
        linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: do a quick exit when syscall number is invalid
Message-ID: <20220329021941.ai3d6fgrkyd5ylto@cyberdelia>
References: <20220326094654.2361956-1-yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
 <202203270449.WBYQF9X3-lkp@intel.com>
 <62426553.1c69fb81.bb808.345c@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <62426553.1c69fb81.bb808.345c@mx.google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 03/29, CGEL wrote:
>>    In file included from include/linux/init.h:5,
>>                     from kernel/auditsc.c:34:
>>    kernel/auditsc.c: In function '__audit_syscall_exit':
>> >> kernel/auditsc.c:2081:61: error: 'NR_syscalls' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'si_syscall'?
>>     2081 |             unlikely(context->major < 0 || context->major > NR_syscalls))
>>          |                                                             ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
>Sorry could anybody give a hand to solve this? It works well on x86_64 and arm64.
>I have no alpha environment and not familiar to this arch, much thanks!

Sorry, no experience either, but from a quick look at arch/alpha/include/asm/unistd.h
shows that it's called NR_SYSCALLS for alpha arch, for whatever reason.


HTH

Enzo