Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751717AbXB0RjN (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:39:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751712AbXB0RjI (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:39:08 -0500 Received: from relay00.pair.com ([209.68.5.9]:1074 "HELO relay00.pair.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751700AbXB0RjF (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:39:05 -0500 X-pair-Authenticated: 24.241.238.207 Message-ID: <45E46CB4.1080009@cybsft.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:39:00 -0600 From: "K.R. Foley" Organization: Cybersoft Solutions, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: v2.6.20-rt1, yum/rpm References: <20070205065636.GA1652@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070205065636.GA1652@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 798 Lines: 25 Ingo Molnar wrote: > i have released the v2.6.20-rt1 kernel, which can be downloaded from the > usual place: > I have a couple of questions regarding priorities of the softirqs, IRQ handlers, etc. With some exceptions, back in 2.6.18 and prior patches the IRQ threads were prioritized between 50 and 25 and the most of the softirqs were prioritized at 1? In newer patches it looks like they are all prioritized at 50? I was just curious what went into making these choices? I am just trying to better understand these decisions. Thanks, -- kr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/