Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752560AbXB0Uks (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:40:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752561AbXB0Uks (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:40:48 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:40364 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752560AbXB0Ukr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:40:47 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hzkg2MGDGZmmASfjZL9E9OrWaIJGqh2qJU1RfwELZHHnla9YLc9GD1+3ndFBQ54YtK0mkIol2Iw0UMiVv26X40bfN6qYGrv6KXfjwQYeQXZKP430szUTZ6NpIes6ER1c+oLhpkHPm9x0yAAaP/+qZoJbIr/0D2sT8A9jrksPXWc= Message-ID: <29495f1d0702271240p1f446a74me9623ae756c67eb5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:40:45 -0800 From: "Nish Aravamudan" To: "Paulo Marques" Subject: Re: SMP performance degradation with sysbench Cc: "Rik van Riel" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?\"J.A._Magall=F3n\"?=" , "Hiro Yoshioka" , davej@redhat.com, harlan@artselect.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, l_allegrucci@yahoo.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, suparna@in.ibm.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com In-Reply-To: <45E4469C.8000505@grupopie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070226223645.GA24174@redhat.com> <98df96d30702261632u7479c9b2sce93f80f68bbc8d0@mail.gmail.com> <45E37EA3.3060101@redhat.com> <20070227.130305.424251739.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com> <45E3B421.603@redhat.com> <20070227091409.6f3d12f9@werewolf-wl> <45E439E4.5030703@redhat.com> <45E4469C.8000505@grupopie.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1864 Lines: 46 On 2/27/07, Paulo Marques wrote: > Rik van Riel wrote: > > J.A. Magall?n wrote: > >>[...] > >> Its the same to answer 4+4 queries than 8 at half the speed, isn't it ? > > > > That still doesn't fix the potential Linux problem that this > > benchmark identified. > > > > To clarify: I don't care as much about MySQL performance as > > I care about identifying and fixing this potential bug in > > Linux. > > IIRC a long time ago there was a change in the scheduler to prevent a > low prio task running on a sibling of a hyperthreaded processor to slow > down a higher prio task on another sibling of the same processor. > > Basically the scheduler would put the low prio task to sleep during an > adequate task slice to allow the other sibling to run at full speed for > a while. > > I don't know the scheduler code well enough, but comments like this one > make me think that the change is still in place: > If that is the case, turning off CONFIG_SCHED_SMT would solve the problem. To chime in here, I was attempting to reproduce this on an 8-way Xeon box (4 dual-core). SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC on led to scaling issues when above 4 threads (4 threads was the peak). To the point, where I couldn't break 1000 transactions per second. Turning both off (with 2.6.20.1) gives much better performance through 16 threads. I am now running for the cases from 17 to 32 to see if I can reproduce the problem at hand. I'll regenerate my data and post numbers soon. I don't know if anyone else has those on in their kernel .config, but I'd suggest turning them off, as Paulo said. Thanks, Nish - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/