Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750897AbXB1Bup (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:50:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751048AbXB1Bup (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:50:45 -0500 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([64.65.253.246]:53295 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751042AbXB1Buo (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:50:44 -0500 Message-ID: <45E4E036.20507@tmr.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:51:50 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061105 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Ale CC: Michael-Luke Jones , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Sata RAID References: <8d158e1f0702240210x71f981a6xf2fe8917dac5e91a@mail.gmail.com> <200702241624.17024.bzolnier@gmail.com> <6C96CE3D-85F5-479D-BD44-F5DA0AE744FF@fastmail.to> <8d158e1f0702240919v33182ca2qc0a15fdd27a3f96a@mail.gmail.com> <8d158e1f0702260030l2f3d9f2ar5c662c807f64f7f7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8d158e1f0702260030l2f3d9f2ar5c662c807f64f7f7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1576 Lines: 34 Patrick Ale wrote: > On 2/24/07, Patrick Ale wrote: >> On 2/24/07, Michael-Luke Jones wrote: > > One more question regarding this, I am aware its not *really* kernel > related but answering this question now will save yourself a lot of > bogus emails from me about MD oopses later and all, and I want to > setup my disks right once and for all and never witness what I > witnessed last weeks with my ATA disks. > > Would you use MD at all, taking in account the disks come from the > same batch and all? I hear these things about MD/RAID being pointless > when you use disks from the same brand/type/batch since they most > likely will break shortly after each other. Well, for values of "shortly" in months in most cases. These are consumer goods, I would not expect units with consecutive serial numbers to fail separated by such a short time that you can't do a backup and/or replace and rebuild. If quality control were so good they are likely to fail at the same time it would be so good they would be obsolete before they failed. That urban myth is a good reason to do backups, but a bad reason to avoid RAID. -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/