Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
        Reddy Muralidhar <muralidhar.reddy@intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
        Rander Wang <rander.wang@intel.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
        perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.16 08/59] ASoC: SOF: Intel: match sdw version on link_slaves_found
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:47:40 -0400
Message-Id: <20220330114831.1670235-8-sashal@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220330114831.1670235-1-sashal@kernel.org>
References: <20220330114831.1670235-1-sashal@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit f67c0c0d3b9048d86ea6ae52e36a2b78c48f265d ]

Codecs with the same part id, manufacturer id and part id, but different
sdw version should be treated as different codecs. For example, rt711 and
rt711-sdca are different. So, we should match sdw version as well.

Reported-by: Reddy Muralidhar <muralidhar.reddy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220120232157.199919-2-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c
index 25200a0e1dc9..fc88296ab898 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c
@@ -1200,7 +1200,7 @@ static bool link_slaves_found(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
 	struct hdac_bus *bus = sof_to_bus(sdev);
 	struct sdw_intel_slave_id *ids = sdw->ids;
 	int num_slaves = sdw->num_slaves;
-	unsigned int part_id, link_id, unique_id, mfg_id;
+	unsigned int part_id, link_id, unique_id, mfg_id, version;
 	int i, j, k;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < link->num_adr; i++) {
@@ -1210,12 +1210,14 @@ static bool link_slaves_found(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
 		mfg_id = SDW_MFG_ID(adr);
 		part_id = SDW_PART_ID(adr);
 		link_id = SDW_DISCO_LINK_ID(adr);
+		version = SDW_VERSION(adr);
 
 		for (j = 0; j < num_slaves; j++) {
 			/* find out how many identical parts were reported on that link */
 			if (ids[j].link_id == link_id &&
 			    ids[j].id.part_id == part_id &&
-			    ids[j].id.mfg_id == mfg_id)
+			    ids[j].id.mfg_id == mfg_id &&
+			    ids[j].id.sdw_version == version)
 				reported_part_count++;
 		}
 
@@ -1224,21 +1226,24 @@ static bool link_slaves_found(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
 
 			if (ids[j].link_id != link_id ||
 			    ids[j].id.part_id != part_id ||
-			    ids[j].id.mfg_id != mfg_id)
+			    ids[j].id.mfg_id != mfg_id ||
+			    ids[j].id.sdw_version != version)
 				continue;
 
 			/* find out how many identical parts are expected */
 			for (k = 0; k < link->num_adr; k++) {
 				u64 adr2 = link->adr_d[k].adr;
-				unsigned int part_id2, link_id2, mfg_id2;
+				unsigned int part_id2, link_id2, mfg_id2, version2;
 
 				mfg_id2 = SDW_MFG_ID(adr2);
 				part_id2 = SDW_PART_ID(adr2);
 				link_id2 = SDW_DISCO_LINK_ID(adr2);
+				version2 = SDW_VERSION(adr2);
 
 				if (link_id2 == link_id &&
 				    part_id2 == part_id &&
-				    mfg_id2 == mfg_id)
+				    mfg_id2 == mfg_id &&
+				    version2 == version)
 					expected_part_count++;
 			}
 
-- 
2.34.1