Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:18:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:18:26 -0500 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:42960 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:18:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:18:04 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: n0ano@indstorage.com Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Achim_Kr=FCmmel?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Intel I860 Message-ID: <20011127001804.U5770@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <3BFD0F19.86D23BEB@dohle.com> <20011126152803.A8684@tlaloc.indstorage.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <20011126152803.A8684@tlaloc.indstorage.com>; from n0ano@indstorage.com on Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:28:03PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:28:03PM -0700, n0ano@indstorage.com wrote: > Achim- > > Uh, what exactly do you think you have here? The I860 was a > completely new architecture that Intel dropped over 5 years > ago. I've got one running Unix SVR4 in my basement but you > can't buy an I860 motherboard today. > > (For the record the 860 was a great architecture for the time > and I'm still bitter that Intel dropped it but that's a different > story.) Uh? You're using the word i860 (the processor, I gather) and great in the same sentence, and not in combination with disaster?! That's a first... The i960 is fully ok, but the i860 was a pile of crap. /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/