Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To:     kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
        pasic@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scgl@linux.ibm.com,
        mimu@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 10/18] KVM: s390: pv: add mmu_notifier
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:25:57 +0200
Message-Id: <20220330122605.247613-11-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220330122605.247613-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20220330122605.247613-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Add an mmu_notifier for protected VMs. The callback function is
triggered when the mm is torn down, and will attempt to convert all
protected vCPUs to non-protected. This allows the mm teardown to use
the destroy page UVC instead of export.

Also make KVM select CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER, needed to use mmu_notifiers.

Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
 arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig            |  1 +
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |  5 ++++-
 arch/s390/kvm/pv.c               | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index a22c9266ea05..1bccb8561ba9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/kvm.h>
 #include <linux/seqlock.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
 #include <asm/debug.h>
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/fpu/api.h>
@@ -921,6 +922,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_pv {
 	u64 guest_len;
 	unsigned long stor_base;
 	void *stor_var;
+	struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
 };
 
 struct kvm_arch{
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
index 2e84d3922f7c..33f4ff909476 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ config KVM
 	select SRCU
 	select KVM_VFIO
 	select INTERVAL_TREE
+	select MMU_NOTIFIER
 	help
 	  Support hosting paravirtualized guest machines using the SIE
 	  virtualization capability on the mainframe. This should work
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 21fcca09e9bf..446f89db93a1 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/pgtable.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
 
 #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
 #include <asm/lowcore.h>
@@ -2833,8 +2834,10 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
 	 * can mess with the pv state. To avoid lockdep_assert_held from
 	 * complaining we do not use kvm_s390_pv_is_protected.
 	 */
-	if (kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm))
+	if (kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm)) {
 		kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(kvm, &rc, &rrc);
+		mmu_notifier_unregister(&kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier, kvm->mm);
+	}
 	debug_unregister(kvm->arch.dbf);
 	free_page((unsigned long)kvm->arch.sie_page2);
 	if (!kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm))
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
index 76ef33a277d3..788b96b36931 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <asm/mman.h>
 #include <linux/pagewalk.h>
 #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
 #include "kvm-s390.h"
 
 static void kvm_s390_clear_pv_state(struct kvm *kvm)
@@ -192,6 +193,26 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
 	return -EIO;
 }
 
+static void kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
+					     struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	struct kvm *kvm = container_of(subscription, struct kvm, arch.pv.mmu_notifier);
+	u16 dummy;
+
+	/*
+	 * No locking is needed since this is the last thread of the last user of this
+	 * struct mm.
+	 * When the struct kvm gets deinitialized, this notifier is also
+	 * unregistered. This means that if this notifier runs, then the
+	 * struct kvm is still valid.
+	 */
+	kvm_s390_cpus_from_pv(kvm, &dummy, &dummy);
+}
+
+static const struct mmu_notifier_ops kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops = {
+	.release = kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_release,
+};
+
 int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
 {
 	struct uv_cb_cgc uvcb = {
@@ -233,6 +254,11 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 	kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle = uvcb.guest_handle;
+	/* Add the notifier only once. No races because we hold kvm->lock */
+	if (kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier.ops != &kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops) {
+		kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier.ops = &kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops;
+		mmu_notifier_register(&kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier, kvm->mm);
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1