Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752128AbXB1LBh (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:01:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752126AbXB1LBh (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:01:37 -0500 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:48315 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752129AbXB1LBg (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:01:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:31:22 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Aneesh Kumar , LKML , Andrew Morton , Pavel Machek , "Paul E. McKenney" , Gautham R Shenoy Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] Freezer: Fix vfork problem Message-ID: <20070228110122.GC15509@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com References: <200702261139.59130.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070227215314.GA427@tv-sign.ru> <20070228012301.GH29179@in.ibm.com> <200702281157.28381.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200702281157.28381.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 511 Lines: 15 On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:57:27AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Which is because we don't want the kernel threads to be frozen in unexpected > places, so we allow them to block freeze_processes() instead or to set > PF_NOFREEZE? Looks good! -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/