Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932167AbXB1MLL (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:11:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932173AbXB1MLL (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:11:11 -0500 Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:41646 "EHLO rgminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932167AbXB1MLK (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:11:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:10:40 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Xiaoning Ding Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: a bug in AS scheduler? Message-ID: <20070228121040.GW3733@kernel.dk> References: <45E5038F.1090200@cse.ohio-state.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45E5038F.1090200@cse.ohio-state.edu> X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 875 Lines: 25 On Tue, Feb 27 2007, Xiaoning Ding wrote: > Hi, > > I am reading the source code AS scheduler in 2.6.18(as-ioscheduler.c). > In function as_close_req, variable delay is in millisecond, while > ad->antic_expire is in jiffies. Doesn't the comparison of delay and > ad->antic_expire make any problem? > The related source code is quoted blow: > > if (ad->antic_status == ANTIC_OFF || !ad->ioc_finished) > delay = 0; > else > delay = ((jiffies - ad->antic_start) * 1000) / HZ; antic_start is in jiffies, the difference is here multiplied by 1000 and divided by HZ to turn it into msecs. so delay is in msecs. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/