Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
From:   OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     qianfan <qianfanguijin@163.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fat: Add ratelimit to fat*_ent_bread()
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:47:41 +0900
Message-ID: <87bkxogfeq.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

fat*_ent_bread() can be the cause of too many report on I/O error
path. So use fat_msg_ratelimit() instead.

Reported-by: qianfan <qianfanguijin@163.com>
Tested-by: qianfan <qianfanguijin@163.com>
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
---
 fs/fat/fatent.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fat/fatent.c b/fs/fat/fatent.c
index 978ac67..1db348f 100644
--- a/fs/fat/fatent.c	2022-03-28 14:34:04.582208819 +0900
+++ b/fs/fat/fatent.c	2022-03-28 14:39:26.884325073 +0900
@@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ static int fat12_ent_bread(struct super_
 err_brelse:
 	brelse(bhs[0]);
 err:
-	fat_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "FAT read failed (blocknr %llu)", (llu)blocknr);
+	fat_msg_ratelimit(sb, KERN_ERR, "FAT read failed (blocknr %llu)",
+			  (llu)blocknr);
 	return -EIO;
 }
 
@@ -107,8 +108,8 @@ static int fat_ent_bread(struct super_bl
 	fatent->fat_inode = MSDOS_SB(sb)->fat_inode;
 	fatent->bhs[0] = sb_bread(sb, blocknr);
 	if (!fatent->bhs[0]) {
-		fat_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "FAT read failed (blocknr %llu)",
-		       (llu)blocknr);
+		fat_msg_ratelimit(sb, KERN_ERR, "FAT read failed (blocknr %llu)",
+				  (llu)blocknr);
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 	fatent->nr_bhs = 1;
_
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>