Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Sender: Corey Minyard <tcminyard@gmail.com>
From:   minyard@acm.org
To:     Chen Guanqiao <chen.chenchacha@foxmail.com>
Cc:     openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ipmi: add limits on users and messages
Date:   Tue, 29 Mar 2022 13:33:36 -0500
Message-Id: <20220329183340.471474-1-minyard@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

I had actually already started working on a set of patches for this, but
I've incorporated some of your work.

There were problems with your patches:

* The limits on messages were global, not per-user.  This could cause
  unfairness in the interface.

* The counts were on the BMC, not on the interface.  The interface is
  the right place to put them, as that's where the messages flow
  through, and it's easier to do.

* Going through all the messages to get the count is kind of inefficient
  to do on a per-send basis.  Keep a count instead.

* The ability to flush messages is a no-go.  The IPMI driver guarantees
  responses and internal kernel users (and external users) rely on that
  property.  A flush could break the watchdog or ACPI.  The messages
  will just have to time out.

This is my proposal for your review.

Thanks,

-corey