Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Sender: Corey Minyard <tcminyard@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:31:31 -0500
From:   Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>,
        openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: use simple i2c probe function
Message-ID: <20220330133131.GU3457@minyard.net>
Reply-To: minyard@acm.org
References: <20220324171159.544565-1-steve@sk2.org>
 <YkQi6EIhknRJgv3i@shikoro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YkQi6EIhknRJgv3i@shikoro>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 11:29:12AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 06:11:59PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
> > their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
> > ("probe_new") can be used instead.
> > 
> > This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
> 
> Looks good and builds fine:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> 


Thanks, I have this queued and I've added the review.

I'm just waiting for the merge window to close before I put it into the
next tree.

-corey