Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:00:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:00:01 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:23306 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:59:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:59:27 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Alan Cox Cc: "Nathan G. Grennan" , Subject: Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Any ideas of how to fix this for 2.4.16? > > If it is the VM then watch for a patch from Rik for 2.4.16 + RielVM. > If that helps then we know its VM related , if not then we know to > look at other suspects The patch to 2.4.16 + rielvm (well, a merge between my VM and Andrea's VM) is available on my home page and seems stable now. FYI, my 64MB dual pentium test box seems to "happily" survive a 'make -j bzImage' over NFS... However, I suspect this unresponsiveness issue is related to either IO scheduling or write throttling, and that code is the same in both VMs. I'll take a look at smoothing out writes so we can get this thing fixed in both VMs. The patch is on http://www.surriel.com/patches/ regards, Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/