Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Yj19RH3qpzQsIV/O@shikoro> <CAHk-=wgoeUc15-8Wu8U=4FnwhgmyU3C13R107oigbmJRpi_sZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YkIF9OqbZQ8yinz8@ninjato> <20220329142642.11692e8f@endymion.delvare>
In-Reply-To: <20220329142642.11692e8f@endymion.delvare>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:10:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgqC1OU_a_r80-1EdwSc2SFY0m-V9u6XXr24_C3_XaNcw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for v5.18
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 5:26 AM Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:
>
> And this is how I came to the conclusion that, despite the weird
> feeling that there are too many conditionals in the i2c-piix4 driver,
> there's nothing smart that can be done to get rid of them, and we just
> have to live with them.

Thanks for the very complete response. Color me convinced.

              Linus