Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
To:     jiangshanlai@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] workqueue: Restrict kworker in the offline CPU pool running on housekeeping CPUs
Date:   Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:57:17 +0800
Message-Id: <20220331055717.2659428-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

When CPU going offline, all workers in this CPU pool will lose
affinity to this CPU, and may run to isolated CPU. like kworker
in unbound pool, set CPU affinity of these kworker is
wq_unbound_cpumask.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
---
 v1->v2:
 Replace housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_WQ) with wq_unbound_cpumask.

 kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index abcc9a2ac319..b447012df177 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5023,7 +5023,7 @@ static void unbind_workers(int cpu)
 
 		for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
 			kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, -1);
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpu_possible_mask) < 0);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, wq_unbound_cpumask) < 0);
 		}
 
 		mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
-- 
2.25.1