Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:14:53 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
Cc:     vireshk@kernel.org, nm@ti.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] opp: use list iterator only inside the loop
Message-ID: <20220331084453.jlmuilvg3n3ve27t@vireshk-i7>
References: <20220331083018.31995-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220331083018.31995-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

This is V3 and not V2. You need to be careful to update them for every
single version of patch you send.

On 31-03-22, 16:30, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
> macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
> variable after the loop body.
> 
> To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
> concluded to use a separate dedicated pointer variable [1].
> 
> In this case, use a new variable 'iter' as the list iterator, while
> use the old variable 'new_dev' as a dedicated pointer to point to the
> found entry. And BUG_ON(!new_dev);.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> changes since v1:
>  - use BUG_ON(!new_dev); instead of return; (Viresh Kumar)
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220331015818.28045-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com/
> 
> ---
>  drivers/opp/debugfs.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Looks good now. I will apply it in few days.

-- 
viresh