Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2726:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ib38csp226744pxb; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:06:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMcMEtI3SDGoRWoC0nHiwTv94s2J2MOidyLg3QUbAoNVBvF+V/m6uMX9YMnkE6u/NzQddl X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b89:b0:1c8:105a:2262 with SMTP id lr9-20020a17090b4b8900b001c8105a2262mr5514244pjb.225.1648724777120; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:06:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1648724777; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=N9fje/3EgZDN4NyXe4nQq98bONsMzYHSXLYO+ebzvc8YSA/Pov9B7CzNW48FXvP9Dd a7km2KGvMDgnepQKe/TyZiZHfx9uLsOHMTnbqDjiEPxtxHIAqFIKdC65ioKnW6lWZgUG XNgQv+KD24iyx/1tWysbsW2WmWx+PSn1oNHKoCYGM7o0CjzZfV46VAhAqV+u52NzAQbx kJiwGl+DzBy7sNKwpDadQeGQLTd2cnCPYNf0mwpgTe3ioo4kGff0boOl9UxeRnfF+4jH dMFpSCJCIS3TAglQWVl4iSnKu5qwV4PdAMNKkQfLQ3FQzXWGNdxjCh0p8XJLnAo8tyqe gsHg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:subject:cc:to :from:date; bh=H/pH1xiIAqKUPmv3fPHjIFYrDyo/1YmHkGSsPHR1l9I=; b=BHLIXyf0SV9qZz/jDVY6konvf0nJyS1jfOeeumG+NH/1RhwLILWXDg0Xg1AY+WwBJN Kp+yFpxVqC4vTvlHtDtigJP69ac0+xRYj3UGf8FQ9v2zI4FeBgbSs34QXYH+8NvKepLF PzC9GZg7kca6orqPAKAi9pLLIXX0HrHYjdEc6ciUAtmbt+17Bg5ypAsXRA7kIw4cFipF 8X1sjMaBt33SWLEy3qANJV/ZkOzixNPyiu1lELNCpFbzyhCwLOovaXHiBeiB1BGB8Qld sfq+aYClISchWXRag0qusFzSLUvl7IOw7SIAklRefeyCOY6dwMVCuDvjTZMxUFKJNnKl 8TCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s11-20020a056a0008cb00b004fa3a8e00b5si25140183pfu.364.2022.03.31.04.06.03; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231945AbiCaHOS (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 31 Mar 2022 03:14:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40606 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232020AbiCaHNi (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2022 03:13:38 -0400 Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF020C3374; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id E491792009D; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:11:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE70692009B; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 08:11:28 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 08:11:28 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Bjorn Helgaas cc: Stefan Roese , Jim Wilson , David Abdurachmanov , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4] pci: Work around ASMedia ASM2824 PCIe link training failures Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Attempt to handle cases with a downstream port of the ASMedia ASM2824 PCIe switch where link training never completes and the link continues switching between speeds indefinitely with the data link layer never reaching the active state. It has been observed with a downstream port of the ASMedia ASM2824 Gen 3 switch wired to the upstream port of the Pericom PI7C9X2G304 Gen 2 switch, using a Delock Riser Card PCI Express x1 > 2 x PCIe x1 device, P/N 41433, wired to a SiFive HiFive Unmatched board. In this setup the switches are supposed to negotiate the link speed of preferably 5.0GT/s, falling back to 2.5GT/s. However the link continues oscillating between the two speeds, at the rate of 34-35 times per second, with link training reported repeatedly active ~84% of the time, e.g.: 02:03.0 PCI bridge [0604]: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM2824 PCIe Gen3 Packet Switch [1b21:2824] (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) [...] Bus: primary=02, secondary=05, subordinate=05, sec-latency=0 [...] Capabilities: [80] Express (v2) Downstream Port (Slot+), MSI 00 [...] LnkSta: Speed 5GT/s (downgraded), Width x1 (ok) TrErr- Train+ SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt+ ABWMgmt- [...] LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 8GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis+, Selectable De-emphasis: -3.5dB Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS- Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB [...] Forcibly limiting the target link speed to 2.5GT/s with the upstream ASM2824 device makes the two switches communicate correctly however: 02:03.0 PCI bridge [0604]: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM2824 PCIe Gen3 Packet Switch [1b21:2824] (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) [...] Bus: primary=02, secondary=05, subordinate=09, sec-latency=0 [...] Capabilities: [80] Express (v2) Downstream Port (Slot+), MSI 00 [...] LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s (downgraded), Width x1 (ok) TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive+ BWMgmt- ABWMgmt- [...] LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 2.5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis+, Selectable De-emphasis: -3.5dB Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS- Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB [...] and then: 05:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Pericom Semiconductor PI7C9X2G304 EL/SL PCIe2 3-Port/4-Lane Packet Switch [12d8:2304] (rev 05) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) [...] Bus: primary=05, secondary=06, subordinate=09, sec-latency=0 [...] Capabilities: [c0] Express (v2) Upstream Port, MSI 00 [...] LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s (downgraded), Width x1 (downgraded) TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt- [...] LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis- Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS- Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB [...] Removing the speed restriction afterwards makes the two devices switch to 5.0GT/s then. Make use of these observations then and detect the inability to train the link, by checking for the Data Link Layer Link Active status bit implemented by the ASM2824 being off while the Link Bandwidth Management Status indicating that hardware has changed the link speed or width in an attempt to correct unreliable link operation. Restrict the speed to 2.5GT/s then with the Target Link Speed field, request a retrain and wait 200ms for the data link to go up. If this turns out successful, then lift the restriction, letting the devices negotiate a higher speed. Also check for a 2.5GT/s speed restriction the firmware may have already arranged and lift it too with ports that already report their data link being up. Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki --- Hi, Do you need any further information beyond what I provided in: ? Maciej Changes from v3: - Remove the entry for the ASM2824. Changes from v2: - Regenerate for 5.17-rc2 for a merge conflict. - Replace BUG_ON for a missing PCI Express capability with WARN_ON and an early return. Changes from v1: - Regenerate for a merge conflict. --- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) linux-pcie-asm2824-manual-retrain.diff Index: linux-macro/drivers/pci/quirks.c =================================================================== --- linux-macro.orig/drivers/pci/quirks.c +++ linux-macro/drivers/pci/quirks.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ * file, where their drivers can use them. */ +#include #include #include #include @@ -5895,3 +5896,98 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_IN DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1536, rom_bar_overlap_defect); DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1537, rom_bar_overlap_defect); DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1538, rom_bar_overlap_defect); + +/* + * Retrain the link of a downstream PCIe port by hand if necessary. + * + * This is needed at least where a downstream port of the ASMedia ASM2824 + * Gen 3 switch is wired to the upstream port of the Pericom PI7C9X2G304 + * Gen 2 switch, and observed with the Delock Riser Card PCI Express x1 > + * 2 x PCIe x1 device, P/N 41433, plugged into the SiFive HiFive Unmatched + * board. + * + * In such a configuration the switches are supposed to negotiate the link + * speed of preferably 5.0GT/s, falling back to 2.5GT/s. However the link + * continues switching between the two speeds indefinitely and the data + * link layer never reaches the active state, with link training reported + * repeatedly active ~84% of the time. Forcing the target link speed to + * 2.5GT/s with the upstream ASM2824 device makes the two switches talk to + * each other correctly however. And more interestingly retraining with a + * higher target link speed afterwards lets the two successfully negotiate + * 5.0GT/s. + * + * With the ASM2824 we can rely on the otherwise optional Data Link Layer + * Link Active status bit and in the failed link training scenario it will + * be off along with the Link Bandwidth Management Status indicating that + * hardware has changed the link speed or width in an attempt to correct + * unreliable link operation. For a port that has been left unconnected + * both bits will be clear. So use this information to detect the problem + * rather than polling the Link Training bit and watching out for flips or + * at least the active status. + * + * Restrict the speed to 2.5GT/s then with the Target Link Speed field, + * request a retrain and wait 200ms for the data link to go up. If this + * turns out successful, then lift the restriction, letting the devices + * negotiate a higher speed. Also check for a 2.5GT/s speed restriction + * the firmware may have already arranged and lift it too with ports that + * already report their data link being up. + */ +static void pcie_downstream_link_retrain(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + u16 lnksta, lnkctl2; + u8 pos; + + pos = pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); + WARN_ON(!pos); + if (!pos) + return; + + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2, &lnkctl2); + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnksta); + if ((lnksta & (PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS | PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA)) == + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS) { + unsigned long timeout; + u16 lnkctl; + + pci_info(dev, "broken device, retraining non-functional downstream link at 2.5GT/s...\n"); + + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &lnkctl); + lnkctl |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL; + lnkctl2 &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS; + lnkctl2 |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS_2_5GT; + pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2, lnkctl2); + pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, lnkctl); + + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(200); + do { + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, + &lnksta); + if (lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA) + break; + usleep_range(10000, 20000); + } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)); + + pci_info(dev, "retraining %s!\n", + lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA ? + "succeeded" : "failed"); + } + + if ((lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA) && + (lnkctl2 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS) == PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS_2_5GT) { + u32 lnkcap; + u16 lnkctl; + + pci_info(dev, "removing 2.5GT/s downstream link speed restriction\n"); + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &lnkctl); + pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &lnkcap); + lnkctl |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL; + lnkctl2 &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS; + lnkctl2 |= lnkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS; + pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2, lnkctl2); + pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, lnkctl); + } +} +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ASMEDIA, 0x2824, + pcie_downstream_link_retrain); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_RESUME_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ASMEDIA, 0x2824, + pcie_downstream_link_retrain);