Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To:     Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Cc:     "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20220331091218.641532-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
References: <20220331091218.641532-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: use dedicated list iterator variable
Message-Id: <164872836394.7852.9344079162179392052.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 31 Mar 2022 06:06:03 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:12:18 +0200, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
> macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
> variable after the loop body.
> 
> To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
> concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
> found boolean [1].
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] block: use dedicated list iterator variable
      commit: 4a3b666e0ea977dd40adb56c37a91370f76fa19e

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe