Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2726:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ib38csp987222pxb; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 01:12:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0asDKq++602XJyihdb1gATnKZ3yDVd5Ogxx+ShDKZJ0cyjP8KeRDBZv7YhdIUrrP7CpUi X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:d2:b0:413:2e50:d6fd with SMTP id i18-20020a05640200d200b004132e50d6fdmr19925576edu.171.1648800775319; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 01:12:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1648800775; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ur69MhDUkI7kP9U5O+eKEG1cw+0c/swK9ndSGYPcJ39qFI4lThvsfmgT3R3AjnKpQ3 lxscmFMcnVXIMvqOlZcMfW8/vGtLlEGQ0r4s2s2huKjP/wDvBmuvZTojSa5FrvBV2ueF nsbl4ihjRzxczeaoZbjfmwYnzWkU+fcZB4YFKS8GMBbCPL7PmJ4FDrfa4HCNWmg72Hvo iwV09DG/au7SiSGc5yfx7mA43H2IKs4H7iqpiZmeVMbh+PPAEoKYjAtm5CZPSVeHxYr1 rH8LvAxIYnYgdvdJ1rRj0C5/aIjAw3y6NOkZifcN1KTdM5VDGgfYfdCVcFUhxqG5TORh 1TVQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=En0+Ez0hLVg9a/gmms0/3Fe14xiZDRfSV7zpmKpvkd0=; b=gsVcEofYG4SeO3mFwUybCV34r66W2IL9DhUYVLn4lcPj5lCu9erpn8+1q37MSPxqza RODLUpFp5gHgNfeh3/wuMr261dan8xMV+JAGgG6nXRfqZAbURBuSe2LZGMLOvWgssqwQ zQzO7rvZTNrgWhWGK1kZyb5dxxPL+YiNA+ukGVHBfjNgIqWCPKUiAy1nfJP0azfukKAd tyyfDn4rhb3e71hCYAeqP/Hhj9QiQh9mCQkZwyk6IjxDDIAY/hJNsEASDgXRDTJHycY2 1QJw5mEL/2Lua3c/eeKrWG4ZfGzX1WYqJM3ihyA5d72SnehumfYbxXnsZV+PEK12F6HS C8Mw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a15-20020a50da4f000000b00419b922791dsi1169661edk.413.2022.04.01.01.12.30; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 01:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235397AbiCaL7z (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 31 Mar 2022 07:59:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44144 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235373AbiCaL7t (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2022 07:59:49 -0400 Received: from out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87403208C12; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:58:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R201e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04407;MF=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=18;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0V8iijnE_1648727878; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0V8iijnE_1648727878) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 31 Mar 2022 19:57:59 +0800 From: Jeffle Xu To: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, xiang@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, willy@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com, bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com, tao.peng@linux.alibaba.com, gerry@linux.alibaba.com, eguan@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luodaowen.backend@bytedance.com, tianzichen@kuaishou.com, fannaihao@baidu.com Subject: [PATCH v7 03/19] cachefiles: notify user daemon when withdrawing cookie Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 19:57:37 +0800 Message-Id: <20220331115753.89431-4-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20220331115753.89431-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20220331115753.89431-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Notify user daemon that cookie is going to be withdrawn, providing a hint that the associated anon_fd can be closed. The anon_fd attached in the CLOSE request shall be same with that in the previous OPEN request. Be noted that this is only a hint. User daemon can close the anon_fd when receiving the CLOSE request, then it will receive another anon_fd if the cookie gets looked up. Or it can also ignore the CLOSE request, and keep writing data into the anon_fd. However the next time cookie gets looked up, the user daemon will still receive another anon_fd. Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu --- fs/cachefiles/interface.c | 2 ++ fs/cachefiles/internal.h | 5 +++++ fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/cachefiles.h | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/interface.c b/fs/cachefiles/interface.c index ae93cee9d25d..a69073a1d3f0 100644 --- a/fs/cachefiles/interface.c +++ b/fs/cachefiles/interface.c @@ -362,6 +362,8 @@ static void cachefiles_withdraw_cookie(struct fscache_cookie *cookie) spin_unlock(&cache->object_list_lock); } + cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(object); + if (object->file) { cachefiles_begin_secure(cache, &saved_cred); cachefiles_clean_up_object(object, cache); diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h index 7d5c7d391fdb..8a397d4da560 100644 --- a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h +++ b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ extern int cachefiles_ondemand_copen(struct cachefiles_cache *cache, char *args); extern int cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(struct cachefiles_object *object); +extern void cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(struct cachefiles_object *object); #else static inline ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct cachefiles_cache *cache, @@ -291,6 +292,10 @@ static inline int cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(struct cachefiles_object *obje { return 0; } + +static inline void cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(struct cachefiles_object *object) +{ +} #endif /* diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c index f0e6e422263b..8cbfba057616 100644 --- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c +++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c @@ -209,6 +209,12 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct cachefiles_cache *cache, goto err_put_fd; } + /* CLOSE request has no reply */ + if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_CLOSE) { + xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id); + complete(&req->done); + } + return n; err_put_fd: @@ -332,6 +338,26 @@ static int init_open_req(struct cachefiles_req *req, void *private) return 0; } +static int init_close_req(struct cachefiles_req *req, void *private) +{ + struct cachefiles_object *object = req->object; + struct cachefiles_close *load = (void *)req->msg.data; + int fd = object->fd; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(fd == -1)) + return -EIO; + + /* + * It's possible if the cookie looking up phase failed before READ + * request has ever been sent. + */ + if (fd == 0) + return -ENOENT; + + load->fd = fd; + return 0; +} + int cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(struct cachefiles_object *object) { struct fscache_cookie *cookie = object->cookie; @@ -356,3 +382,11 @@ int cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(struct cachefiles_object *object) CACHEFILES_OP_OPEN, data_len, init_open_req, NULL); } + +void cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(struct cachefiles_object *object) +{ + cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(object, + CACHEFILES_OP_CLOSE, + sizeof(struct cachefiles_close), + init_close_req, NULL); +} diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/cachefiles.h b/include/uapi/linux/cachefiles.h index 49cb7adb439a..dba97d284899 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/cachefiles.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/cachefiles.h @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ enum cachefiles_opcode { CACHEFILES_OP_OPEN, + CACHEFILES_OP_CLOSE, }; /* @@ -36,4 +37,8 @@ struct cachefiles_open { __u8 data[]; }; +struct cachefiles_close { + __u32 fd; +}; + #endif -- 2.27.0