Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752062AbXB1V0f (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:26:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752041AbXB1V0f (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:26:35 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:39259 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752044AbXB1V0e (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:26:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:26:16 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Michael Hanselmann Cc: Linux Kernel , Antonino Daplas Subject: Re: fix implicit declaration in nv_backlight. Message-ID: <20070228212616.GC5169@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Michael Hanselmann , Linux Kernel , Antonino Daplas References: <20070228173625.GA3359@redhat.com> <20070228211324.GA26983@hansmi.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070228211324.GA26983@hansmi.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 567 Lines: 18 On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:13:24PM +0100, Michael Hanselmann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:36:25PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > +#ifdef __powerpc__ > > Is __powerpc__ defined when cross compiling? I'd rather use > CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT instead of it. Sounds ok to me. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/