Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220316200633.28974-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <YkYWzf7J17AfXgLl@robh.at.kernel.org> <CA+V-a8sia2YgWmry+SxJu3asD47PSD6UnND33599ygTBymPy_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8sia2YgWmry+SxJu3asD47PSD6UnND33599ygTBymPy_g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:06:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+P6GTXcwqf8EL+vBdJWSDM+Bxxm5MPEyJPF8A3ZWaQ3A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] of/platform: Drop static setup of IRQ resource from
 DT core
To:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 2:42 AM Lad, Prabhakar
<prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:02 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 08:06:33PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > > Now that all the DT drivers have switched to platform_get_irq() we can now
> > > safely drop the static setup of IRQ resource from DT core code.
> > >
> > > With the above change hierarchical setup of irq domains is no longer
> > > bypassed and thus allowing hierarchical interrupt domains to describe
> > > interrupts using "interrupts" DT property.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> > > ---
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Sending this as RFC as couple of more drivers need to hit -rc yet with
> > > the platform_get_irq() change while that is in progress I wanted to get
> > > some feedback on this patch.
> >
> > I just applied this on top of current master and pushed to my
> > for-kernelci branch. It should show up in kernelCI in a bit. I did this
> > before all the fixes too and there were definitely a couple of test
> > regressions.
> >
> Any chance you can share the regressions or maybe the CI script so
> that I can reproduce it locally.

It will show up here[1] as 'robh', but it still hasn't built yet which
is strange.

Rob

[1] https://linux.kernelci.org/job/