Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220331151654.184433-1-javierm@redhat.com> <CAMj1kXHgyjB_BVzXx+CK0tBuJpZ3h=8XKus7nWiyovECjVQ0gw@mail.gmail.com>
 <YkYA/Wpqa/PMczkp@lx-t490> <CAFOAJEeKNy0HW82W6HV_49d5sc5L0m62QDfY9qA1906_ZzGRYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <Ykas9iX/D3WURx8T@linutronix.de> <78a0360d-1a27-5280-10bf-d27d1d306fa5@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <78a0360d-1a27-5280-10bf-d27d1d306fa5@redhat.com>
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:34:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGEBtcdD+3MFK5gO6vCw8dg=ruTthdWGVUu1eJpgZXf8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] efi: Allow to enable EFI runtime services by default
 on RT
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>, Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>,
        Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>,
        Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>,
        Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
        Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
        linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 10:33, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javierm@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Sebastian,
>
> On 4/1/22 09:42, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2022-04-01 00:19:57 [+0200], Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >>> In case of (CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y && CONFIG_EFI_DISABLE_RUNTIME=n),
> >>> shouldn't we add a small message in the kernel log warning that EFI
> >>> runtime services are enabled for the RT kernel?
> >>>
> >>> In almost all HW, except custom ones with "verified" firmware, such a
> >>> warning would be useful... This is especially true since in the embedded
> >>
> >> I considered that as well but was not sure about what that message should be.
> >
> > This makes sense and we had this in the past but dropped it for some
> > reason.
> >
>
> Ok, something like the following maybe? If you agree, I'll squash in v3:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index ff57db8f8d05..08d329a5179b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -362,6 +362,8 @@ static int __init efisubsys_init(void)
>
>         if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES))
>                 efi.runtime_supported_mask = 0;
> +       else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
> +               pr_warn("EFI runtime services can lead to high latencies on Real-Time kernels\n");
>
>         if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
>                 return 0;
>


I don't think we need another warning.

The kernel log already tells you whether or not EFI runtime services
are enabled.