Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>
Cc:     arei.gonglei@huawei.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, helei.sig11@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce akcipher service for virtio-crypto
In-Reply-To: <20220307040431-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Organization: Red Hat GmbH
References: <20220302033917.1295334-1-pizhenwei@bytedance.com>
 <a9d1dfc1-080e-fba2-8fbb-28718b067e0d@bytedance.com>
 <20220307040431-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.34 (https://notmuchmail.org)
Date:   Mon, 04 Apr 2022 17:39:24 +0200
Message-ID: <87h778g8nn.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 07 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:42:30AM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
>> Hi, Michael & Lei
>> 
>> The full patchset has been reviewed by Gonglei, thanks to Gonglei.
>> Should I modify the virtio crypto specification(use "__le32 akcipher_algo;"
>> instead of "__le32 reserve;" only, see v1->v2 change), and start a new issue
>> for a revoting procedure?
>
> You can but not it probably will be deferred to 1.3. OK with you?
>
>> Also cc Cornelia Huck.

[Apologies, I'm horribly behind on my email backlog, and on virtio
things in general :(]

The akcipher update had been deferred for 1.2, so I think it will be 1.3
material. However, I just noticed while browsing the fine lwn.net merge
window summary that this seems to have been merged already. That
situation is less than ideal, although I don't expect any really bad
problems, given that there had not been any negative feedback for the
spec proposal that I remember.