Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
        Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/mce: Define function to extract ErrorAddr
 from MCA_ADDR
In-Reply-To: <Yknsbp+zMh8Uev8+@zn.tnic>
References: <20220225193342.215780-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
 <20220225193342.215780-3-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
 <YkWrlTIK/ZxsQekX@zn.tnic> <YkmeJFXXbu3aLzzw@zn.tnic>
 <Yknsbp+zMh8Uev8+@zn.tnic>
Date:   Sun, 03 Apr 2022 21:58:07 +0200
Message-ID: <87mth2kkhc.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Apr 03 2022 at 20:50, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 03:16:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
>> index 9ccc2ea0ea00..4acc7959be6e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
>> @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ bool amd_mce_is_memory_error(struct mce *m)
>>  }
>>  
>>  /* Extract [55:<lsb>] where lsb is the LS-*valid* bit of the address bits. */
>> -void smca_extract_err_addr(struct mce *m)
>> +void __always_inline smca_extract_err_addr(struct mce *m)
>
> Ok, flip those - the pedantic bot is not happy:
>
>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c:726:1: warning: 'inline' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
>      726 | void __always_inline smca_extract_err_addr(struct mce *m)
>          | ^~~~
>
> Needs to be
>
> __always_inline void
>
> whateva...

How is __always_inline supposed to work across compilation units w/o
LTO? The callsite is in core.c ...

Thanks,

        tglx