Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220404040153.1509966-1-gch981213@gmail.com> <20220404040153.1509966-3-gch981213@gmail.com>
 <20220404095937.20089db7@xps13> <CAJsYDVK6ya7FR90CtAjbpbF-_+c0GVnsKsN=1wYaoBFx=ysUtQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJsYDVK6ya7FR90CtAjbpbF-_+c0GVnsKsN=1wYaoBFx=ysUtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Apr 2022 17:17:59 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJsYDVLaaGhD6wRvoQokPUQYBvSpN2kZ1kMMw4Z0fCZnHOVYWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] spi: add driver for MTK SPI NAND Flash Interface
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc:     linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@linux.dev>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@intel.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
        Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:NAND FLASH SUBSYSTEM" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi!

On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 5:13 PM Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
> I can implement the following:
> 1. select the minimum capability exceeding ecc.user_conf
> 2. If that doesn't exist, use the calculated one and warn
>    if it doesn't meet ecc.requirements

I mean If there is no ecc.user_conf in the 2nd case :)

> Is this OK?

-- 
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo