Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Fri, 1 Apr 2022 13:28:47 -0700
From:   Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, erdemaktas@google.com,
        Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 038/104] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow per-VM override of
 the TDP max page level
Message-ID: <20220401202847.GA560021@private.email.ne.jp>
References: <cover.1646422845.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
 <5cc4b1c90d929b7f4f9829a42c0b63b52af0c1ed.1646422845.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
 <c6fb151ced1675d1c93aa18ad8c57c2ffc4e9fcb.camel@intel.com>
 <YkcHZo3i+rki+9lK@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YkcHZo3i+rki+9lK@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 02:08:38PM +0000,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022, Kai Huang wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 11:48 -0800, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > In the existing x86 KVM MMU code, there is already max_level member in
> > > struct kvm_page_fault with KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL initial value.  The KVM
> > > page fault handler denies page size larger than max_level.
> > > 
> > > Add per-VM member to indicate the allowed maximum page size with
> > > KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL as default value and initialize max_level in struct
> > > kvm_page_fault with it.
> > > 
> > > For the guest TD, the set per-VM value for allows maximum page size to 4K
> > > page size.  Then only allowed page size is 4K.  It means large page is
> > > disabled.
> > 
> > Do not support large page for TD is the reason that you want this change, but
> > not the result.  Please refine a little bit.
> 
> Not supporting huge pages was fine for the PoC, but I'd prefer not to merge TDX
> without support for huge pages.  Has any work been put into enabling huge pages?
> If so, what's the technical blocker?  If not...

I wanted to get feedback on the approach (always set SPTE to REMOVED_SPTE,
callback, set the SPTE to the final value instead of relying atomic update SPTE)
before going further for large page.
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>