Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2726:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ib38csp3538534pxb; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 20:26:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwM15miPmPBzkkp8+/3oD97qCX//VjrO6WMIGfACXrmU7gHhKm0eWO/M86EjqAfTRy0kZSP X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c215:b0:153:8d90:a108 with SMTP id 21-20020a170902c21500b001538d90a108mr1285048pll.172.1649129188249; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 20:26:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1649129188; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mjWxlUjGW3Hu6htjMF/6yfYuQYdww0vAcMjmeY8p4a5wWSomc8vZhu63QBBPx8qAIU qXK99fguj5DK6V/v5kFEdsdLgYO1TK1Ee2rwOXV5p4L03nB4xah1GcBVxfE3flL5G12o iu+eGH1xvL9w9iT0K/iCX9NqBdAPrM0DjB0EU+DYntGlLOqfOyqwHuXn9nXU/+ig5VRR gE1hMZpY1SElpsVzyFG2RgPnm014iH10CaDNECFKc+7H0/FqYu5Lx2umcoNv5qVvtp2f pIERWR/ft+Bij//3Xk0CGvmgeCzoGYdd0MFfpCm7fGyJozgzAwu9DN/UjMFH8t+8yGcN 9MyQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=vABpGBhTQYtFSOzIwpkJiQp51DmO237fnb6hvRyBNdc=; b=tWc+5hoFcwtF9NVRmwbO9jWtGXFUbhXxHjTXgM7sP4O8y8XhIqL7kfzuhsa1XhGHoi usEoqhS/KkoLUyYbJaw0DignD/k2MFWRtQN9D7opdT9+9D7PRTexz9QIURNOiqZgcoRx NizyXajSCQyH1j/7eEcx5NBcHXj5ZSjwt2TJLkuOjNzLxX2Tc2gaEd2pjVlR20qe1n4e rp8nV6AgRyG9Y1McRkwsNXdq8wwxTNj3nvGuMJubCTp2PgX7/Jm/L7ziTks8Ii0ZuU92 ZpV+BU72QfGjmEGGnU0RULr84ylqnHHbEndCVEVYUjOz86X21+5RrVv4RxFkdgIFEXL6 PBng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=kq6Yz32D; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u14-20020a170902e80e00b00156bc537059si2914412plg.17.2022.04.04.20.26.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 Apr 2022 20:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=kq6Yz32D; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A3F2F92AD; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 18:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1383900AbiDDVmK (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 Apr 2022 17:42:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35536 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1379688AbiDDRvW (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2022 13:51:22 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 914B124953 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id bq8so21522068ejb.10 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 10:49:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vABpGBhTQYtFSOzIwpkJiQp51DmO237fnb6hvRyBNdc=; b=kq6Yz32DSK9zOJ7bPFvcjQc80bzG6ufNST/PLxnAZDgUll2EsHl/7DOBySFQGPGQBO KMODRAMzGVkg4wqeYXpIEQMsuSa51JzFJkHYQV/My/8bthoa0wEAwWm7JnYdhKy4f0IT IYKHfXxzGnqGNhFnMBgVhoIPXAaka/SXRk3ohySgOUIybytsG3xyO6h2D7l0K9voeYoc FYu5KchV6tYEpdQHe9DyEGR2HYvvOlDHDoh49SMaDGfn3ZJuDuFq+z31146fxq/I3vjU 3Dn3Z+2p5l8tnkxwc2V2sRlJAeC27tWtZrvSRD17I4uVRkSVjpL8J+bR+U9LjYMfhu8d puPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vABpGBhTQYtFSOzIwpkJiQp51DmO237fnb6hvRyBNdc=; b=i5ZyRucNGTSexaHynFiugleju1Sv2rg5t1NBm7+1MqFpC9yGxGJ5p+pxXkCF36YoJn KZnAuwxaSq4VeTwVAhbbPPyG+A/989a6chwng6HZr2J2BuP1QIX3gswL/AF+K2gexHRe 8I1sJ+N7+xeQEFJRa3HAa9MycNdH1LJMSkZOHJzzvc0teuI6t2e04TRSKcny4S3OjT5/ 0JVdpp9H4BpPahBGuFJHeJcqI46kAK4UVHSRP2VlGXfcckWFICrx7LfQ5WWCUzmCcK9d 4jUILr0zvOpoO5mIhq+kq7JD8vKTUIDf5DeATKnUI2jf8b3DRDr1R/EGSek0fKSck3gw eVJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kEd/KID7pfWgOQn8/CN4VrAkMn+fpfI4Nk7mySx/df3mJ9d2Y TssszoRWQhMxh4aLFkX2LmpUmpTGjrt7naKKFTXNWw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7304:b0:6da:9243:865 with SMTP id di4-20020a170906730400b006da92430865mr1195561ejc.665.1649094563498; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 10:49:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220328035951.1817417-1-tjmercier@google.com> <20220328035951.1817417-3-tjmercier@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: "T.J. Mercier" Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:49:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v4 2/8] cgroup: gpu: Add a cgroup controller for allocator attribution of GPU memory To: Tejun Heo Cc: David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Jonathan Corbet , Greg Kroah-Hartman , =?UTF-8?B?QXJ2ZSBIasO4bm5ldsOlZw==?= , Todd Kjos , Martijn Coenen , Joel Fernandes , Christian Brauner , Hridya Valsaraju , Suren Baghdasaryan , Sumit Semwal , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , Benjamin Gaignard , Liam Mark , Laura Abbott , Brian Starkey , John Stultz , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Shuah Khan , Kalesh Singh , Kenny.Ho@amd.com, =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= , Shuah Khan , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 10:42 AM Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 01:56:09PM -0700, T.J. Mercier wrote: > > The use case we have for accounting the total (separate from the > > individual devices) is to include the value as part of bugreports, for > > understanding the system-wide amount of dmabuf allocations. I'm not > > aware of an existing need to limit the total. Admittedly this is just > > the sum over the devices, but we currently maintain out of tree code > > to do this sort of thing today. [1] > > So, drop this part? Ok, will do - I'll drop the "total" limitation text from the series. > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun