Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220401114635.GA567659@euclid> <YkdvzIyz/WGlm2uy@iweiny-desk3>
 <20220401224619.GA71483@euclid> <YkgTpS+pzhWPgVIh@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <YkgTpS+pzhWPgVIh@kroah.com>
From:   Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 3 Apr 2022 09:50:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMWRUK4A2DKTaJFhT6b93OjKii=51A9eVKdD3Oov1uTqug9Ttw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: simplify control flow
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 5:13 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 06:46:19PM -0400, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 02:34:04PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:46:35AM -0400, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote:
> > > > The function iterates an index from 0 to NUM_PMKID_CACHE and returns
> > > > the first index for which the condition is true. If no such index is
> > > > found, the function returns -1. Current code has a complex control
> > > > flow that obfuscates this simple task. Replace it with a loop.
> > > >
> > > > Also, given the shortened function body, replace the long variable
> > > > name psecuritypriv with a short variable name p.
> > > >
> > > > Reported by checkpatch:
> > > >
> > > > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Wow!  Nice find!  This is a huge clean up.  Extra kudos recognizing that it is
> > > not just the else statement which is broken here!
> >
> > Thanks! It took me a while to realize what this loop is doing.
> >
> > > The only issue for the patch is that I don't see any maintainer emailed?
> > > However, I don't see a maintainer listed in the MAINTAINERS file so ...
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> >
> > Thanks for the review!
> >
> > Greg, please do not apply this yet. After I sent out the patch, I
> > noticed the comment at the top of the function:
> >
> > /*  Ported from 8185: IsInPreAuthKeyList(). (Renamed from SecIsInPreAuthKeyList(), 2006-10-13.) */
> >
> > So I did a git grep to find the original function and fix it as well,
> > and it looks like there are three copies of the same function in
> > different files:
> >
> > $ git grep IsInPreAuthKeyList
> > r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c:/*  Ported from 8185: IsInPreAuthKeyList(). (Renamed from SecIsInPreAuthKeyList(), 2006-10-13.) */
> > rtl8712/rtl871x_mlme.c: * Ported from 8185: IsInPreAuthKeyList().
> > rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c:/*  Ported from 8185: IsInPreAuthKeyList(). (Renamed from SecIsInPreAuthKeyList(), 2006-10-13.) */
> >
> > I will later send a v2 patch that replaces all of them.
>
> No, please do one patch per driver.  These are all different drivers
> (cut/pasted from some original source), so this patch is fine as-is.
> You can make 2 other patches as well for the other drivers.

Sure, will send two more patches.

Thanks

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


-- 

Sevinj.Aghayeva