Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2355:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id p21csp129634lfu; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 22:12:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyffa6EfSJZI1mE7TZrcpOpo3mtRLuWNHJaPKWPkedSBHGwQ1mFlK4ult+08JeqGp4cO+fI X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1208:b0:151:93fd:d868 with SMTP id l8-20020a170903120800b0015193fdd868mr1644991plh.121.1649135542344; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 22:12:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1649135542; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=00ArHxHR3MAv7Jb7pufuEAFDvVYUvwF5yhYNyrB2qi5KgBkxjvE4NFiMoO2Xdx9BSa IuxL165YchILG2bQ5wnU731gSB8ZjWRGZB3KgeaCB7GHiY2GNbyRX5eqbRt6gWrCMuOR amxlzxMlQuHhMK/a0Qxy2h4RPUt2nq+Ad247jg7KmMsuWhWvgMarS4zUV5xZHTbOwZGa sa/75/KYqf66mh1WzFNF2DujuTUnq2NzKPxi74gVVHWqgcOaJehphHF8rSfC+aJJsaot oWowa77twLv/URBTDGPUhj/m2JktvtMx/jfeturYX8PsihnCGi7cAiRb9sHDPjOtuMxQ kNKQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=F3EPrecEzhzrrvXoqELHqJtm+b4byxIDiM9HD5nNHpY=; b=UAGO3a6t/PWIUYByByGHGTQ7OgM4za63wEkgtk2GigevC54GiotKfqvSRY0QwriVjQ 55pFVDOiu5ARx095hvwdpam15C/AUqExHCSaCzEGhEDL6RuMTIvfLn6T1EPUQFY6eq8v 4Hcydchx3nj7J3jPqOMmrFX0n/0Q2PAAdbH6jj23z3wj70QGTPf7l8UAxXwT+ldKPX3N 87Q7zE1lw2gQHSoXQvuayFlviy9nGUNiffLlMCPH+qXWMRGsYiiO6eWNEE7SqQxsIbNq 6H1w220Z3h2oJ/7IOE6jzbBMH86n7Y5aQOavhy5K1Fl+d6Iphj9WtFOMVq2xi/AlNaGf Qusw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=xS31rscF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o11-20020a170902d4cb00b00156bb3c32b4si2846380plg.323.2022.04.04.22.12.08; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 22:12:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=xS31rscF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229665AbiDEFCA (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 01:02:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36506 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229482AbiDEFBp (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 01:01:45 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01A5855B2; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 21:59:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C0C7B818F8; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 04:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92B5CC340EE; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 04:59:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1649134761; bh=hQ6crrbeRkUVyd50CCzPbUas+awrOppZgAoYpwGZNKc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=xS31rscFR9ifHj5xO13B4MyYRkbzdHVkHpmUSR1w1xJwFyZCtULWor+NCb2pi734h 3lAUM6rEnu99Gs9JRUkfZZ3yrzWyVbHingsCSe0Czar6yJ0fWjca4olmskJ645/T/p /QmdZatgn5GWkFT/76lkquARMIpU5IzXI24ptkbg= Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 06:59:17 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Richard Gong Cc: jikos@kernel.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mario.limonciello@amd.com, amit.bhutani@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: usbhid: set mouse as a wakeup resource Message-ID: References: <20220404214557.3329796-1-richard.gong@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220404214557.3329796-1-richard.gong@amd.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 04:45:57PM -0500, Richard Gong wrote: > USB HID transport layer doesn't set mouse as a wakeup resource by default > so user can't wake system from s0i3 using wired USB mouse. However, users > can wake the same system from s0i3 with the same wired USB mouse > on Windows. Is that because of the huge good/bad list that Windows has for USB mice? Or is it this way now on Windows for _ALL_ USB mice? We have been loath to make this change because not all USB mice could support this, as well as the "wake up a laptop in a backpack that gets the touchpad touched" issue. > > To work around this wakeup issue on Linux, the user must manually enable > wakeup via the following command: > echo enabled > /sys/bus/usb/device/*/power/wakeup > > The mouse is set to wake resource by default to ensure the same behavior > across operating systems. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Gong > --- > drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c > index 54752c85604b..571dded02b3d 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c > @@ -1183,8 +1183,10 @@ static int usbhid_start(struct hid_device *hid) > * devices supporting the boot protocol. > */ > if (interface->desc.bInterfaceSubClass == USB_INTERFACE_SUBCLASS_BOOT && > - interface->desc.bInterfaceProtocol == > - USB_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_KEYBOARD) { > + ((interface->desc.bInterfaceProtocol == > + USB_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_KEYBOARD) > + || (interface->desc.bInterfaceProtocol == > + USB_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_MOUSE))) { This is a big change, how many different systems and devices did you test it on? What about userspace tools that previously assumed the old behavior? Why change this now 20 years later? What changed to require this now? In short, unless there is a really good reason now to make this change, we shouldn't for all the reasons we never did so in the past. Oh, and proof of loads of testing will be required as well. thanks, greg k-h